Batch Resize: Resize multiple images at the same time.Batch Format Change: Convert multiple images to another format at once.Split: Slice a photo into several pieces.Color Picker: Zoom in on images, search and pick a color.Screen Capture: Capture your screenshot and save it.Combine: Attach multiple photos vertically or horizontally to create one final photo.Collage: Merge multiple photos on the collage frame to create one final photo.Cut Out: Remove the background from an image.Editor: 1,000+ Filters & Effects, Frames, Objects, Brushes & Tools, Rotate, Straighten, Flip, Resize, Crop, Circular Crop, Perspective Crop, Mask (Local Adjustments), Redo+, Project.
#PHOTO STACKING SOFTWARE FULL#
But looking even further, the key differences that gives Starry Landscape Stacker the big edge include overall ease of use and the capability to stack more images.įor me, I'm pretty excited to use Starry Landscape Stacker as my favorite stacking app. And when we consider that Starry Landscape Stacker does a great job of blending the two together (which can be a bit of a challenge to do well in Photoshop), I have to say it produces better overall quality than Photoshop. To take this a step further, I'd say that Starry Landscape Stacker produces quality on par with what I typically get from stacking in Photoshop - which says a lot. This feature (which performs pixel binning) can be disabled to get the original size output if desired. This decrease in overall resolution is the result of my having run Sequator with the "Merge Pixels" option enabled. It should be noted that Starry Landscape Stacker produced a final image with the same resolution as the original light frames while Sequator produced an image with just half of the resolution as the original light frames. Starry Landscape Stacker produced an image with better color separation Starry Landscape Stacker produced an image with exposure and contrast that looked more natural and more like the original light frames Starry Landscape Stacker did a better job of maintaining sharp details in both ground and sky But looking with a critical eye, I found that Starry Landscape Stacker came out ahead in several areas. Finally, it was great to see these apps handle far more than the 4 image limit that Photoshop can handle without having to handle the alignment manually. It was also good to see how well both apps did with separating the ground from the sky, stacking, and then combining the stacked results of each back together again.
It was good to see that noise was significantly reduced with both Starry Landscape Stacker and Sequator.
#PHOTO STACKING SOFTWARE MAC#
It's not as good as owning my own Mac computer but this approach is cost effective and it served my needs well. Running Starry Landscape Stacker which runs only on a mac was a bit of a challenge so I rented a virtual mac desktop from.
#PHOTO STACKING SOFTWARE PC#
I tested them both using a 10 image sequence captured at the Upper Terraces near Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.īy the way, I'm primarily a PC user so running Sequator was easy. I was also happy to see apps handling the separation of the foreground from the sky in order to produce results that include sharp details with reduced noise in the foreground as well as the sky.įirst on the scene was Starry Landscape Stacker which runs only on a mac and then more recently an app called Sequator appeared on the market for the pc only. Dark frames are captured after capturing the light frames using the same settings with the lens cap on - to capture hot pixel noise. I was looking for an application that stacks multiple light frames in order to reduce noise but I was pleased to find that apps now handle dark frames as well. So with some promising options, I decided to take a look to see how well they work. More recently, a few apps have appeared on the market that give us some decent alternatives to Photoshop with improved capabilities and ease of use.
0 kommentar(er)
